Film Review – Patrick (2013)

The exceptional Sharni Vinson continues to impress

The exceptional Sharni Vinson continues to impress

Patrick (AKA Patrick: Evil Awakens)

Directed by Mark Hartley

Starring Sharni Vinson, Charles Dance, Rachel Griffiths

Review by Jordan

I don’t believe I’ve ever encountered a movie with such obvious distinction between its successes and failures as Patrick, the 2013 remake of the 1978 Ozploitation classic of the same name. Directed by Not Quite Hollywood’s Mark Hartley, this is a film that could have been quite brilliant but seemingly cheapens itself at every available opportunity, not enough to render it completely unnecessary, but certainly enough to ensure it is unmistakably lesser to the chillingly rendered original and strikingly disappointing.

The story of a nurse (Sharni Vinson) who is appointed to a secluded, haunting clinic by the roaring coast under the supervision of the diabolical Dr Roget (Charles Dance) to assist him with his neurological experiments, where she grows particularly sympathetic towards a strangely likely comatose patient, Patrick (Jackson Gallagher), Hartley’s update makes conscious and continuous efforts to look and sound exceptional but fails in the most important aspect of a film of this type: scares.

It’s as simple as this: Patrick does not feature a single scene to even threaten the hairs on the back of the neck to twitch, let alone stand up. Proceedings begin in an ominous fashion when the opening scene in which a young nurse is stalked in a pitch-black mortuary is hijacked by blatant product-placement that shamefully controls the characters motivations but could maybe be forgiven, were it not for the rest that followed… I’ll avoid mentioning the particular tech giant that paid their way here, suffice to say the many close-ups of, and plot points using smart phones are embarrassing, Australia, even more-so than Hartley’s over-direction and the horrible use of CGI on a malevolent Patrick. It appears that Hartley was under the impression that his audience may lose interest if the camera hinted at remaining fixed for even a moment, or if the action wasn’t constantly moving forward through exposition, or flashbacks that would’ve been better suited placed at the movie’s beginning.

As mentioned at the top however, there are some high points here, the most obvious being the captivating performance of an actress who is close to becoming my new favourite. Vinson improves on her breakthrough performance in You’re Next (2011) and ensures that her character of naive yet determined Kathy JacQuard is constantly worth watching despite the quality of the acting surrounding her (Australian veteran Rachel Griffiths is particularly stale and uninteresting here). The other memorable aspect is Pino Donaggio’s music, that like any good horror score frequently overshadows the action in a joyous way. Donaggio’s work has almost-unbelievably gone underrated over the years, with his pieces for Don’t Look Now (1973), Carrie (1976), Blow Out (1981) and Trauma (1993) among some of the finest of the horror/thriller genres, and he does nothing to harm his glowing reputation here.

So, all things considered, is this remake of one the most successful thrillers this country has produced worth seeing for its pros? or deserving of neglect for its cons? At the risk of sounding slightly hypocritical, I’m still leaning towards the former. It may not be frightening, well directed or sharply penned, but the performance of Vinson, as well as the tremendous music, well crafted costumes and environments and seeing Rachel Griffiths get dispatched horrifically do well to raise it from sub-par to mid-range.

2.5 involuntary spits out of 5

Advertisements

9 responses to “Film Review – Patrick (2013)

  1. I have been on the fence about seeing this one, thank you for settling it for me with a concise informative review. The film sounds a little manic, but whatev. Too bad about Rachel Griffiths sleepwalking her way through this as I’ve had a crush on her for a long time, but if she gets horrifically dispatched she deserves it then. I’ll give it a shot. Thanks Jordan!

  2. I gave it a higher score than you meaning that I did like it a bit more, but I do see your points. However, I feel that while it may not have scared experienced horror viewers like you and I…..newer horror fans may be shivering. I can see the scenes in the room where all the comatose patients are being creepy.

    I agree about the music and the stunning Vinson as well. Had fun with this one!

    P.S. You are Australian right? Have you seen Wolf Creek 2 yet?

    • Yeah you could be right there actually. And maybe my hopes were set to high for this one!

      Ha yep, and nope… missed it at the cinema, though after everything I heard and read about it I can’t say I’m saddened too much by that. Will check it out on blu-ray once it’s out.
      Jordan

  3. I’ve seen ‘Wolf Creek 2,’ much more violent than the first and it isn’t one of those ‘copycat’ sequels! Definitely worth a watch if you enjoyed the first!

  4. Yes, i agree with the rating. The concept is rather new in the horror genres (at least it was with the original film), but the movie lost all sorts of credibility when Patrick starts to be able to interact with pretty much everything/everyone, like a god. Why would he care to induce a car accident when he could just strangle his victims to death. This lack of realism was a major turn off to me…

  5. Pingback: Wednesday Collective — Cyberpunk, Women Direct, Britain Whitewashes, and the Sharni Vinson Rule | Gabriel Diego Valdez·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s